Big data is usually mentioned at least a bit in The Trend Point, and last week was no exception. We noticed that many of the articles seemed to be pointing towards going beyond information retrieval.
Value must be added through the technologies of an information management, search and analytics system. An article quoted in “Big Data without Value is Just a Lot of Data” states the following:
Relying solely on the information gathered by Big Data is like watching a group of people from a relatively far distance. It’s possible to see what they’re doing while they interact with each other and engage in conversations, but it’s virtually impossible to understand why they’re holding those conversations, what are they feeling that drives their actions, what is the emotion underpinning those conversations, and most importantly, how they’ll determine the future behaviour of each individual and the group at large.
We heard a similar sentiment repeated in “Data Visualization Key to Data Understanding” with an emphasis on the end goal being easy access to actionable information. This post relayed the following:
It’s typical for an analyst who has been working on a project for more than two months to show all the frequency or statistical results with a presentation deck consisting of hundreds of slides. Stop! A few charts with great data visualization are worth 1,000 slides. Actionable visualizations such as Price or Attrition Alerts can help sales teams better engage with customers instead of analyzing a plethora of reports. The key: reports should be easy to understand as well as recommend the next actionable step for business leaders.
In another post, we saw another mumbling that big data is a misnomer better represented as big content. We noted some of the thoughts that followed — the necessity of extracting value from unstructured content — in the article “Big Data or Big Content“:
Unstructured content is often included almost as an afterthought, with extraction and enrichment applied on-the-fly, from scratch on a case-by-case basis. This undermines the potential of Big Data in several ways. It raises the cost of incorporating unstructured content while also increasing the opportunities for the introduction of inconsistencies and errors reducing the quality of the final product. Most importantly, the ad hoc approach also reduces the potential of Big Data by obscuring the extent of available raw materials.
It is refreshing to see that these several media sources are no longer discussing simply mashing up raw data from different sources. The important pieces are fusion of data (both structured and unstructured) and that comes through strong analytics that can detect what belongs to the same semantic category. Then a system like Unified Information Access from Sinequa can “fuse” results with other data, like geographic position or customer history, and others.
Jane Smith, June 19, 2013